Showing posts with label Jean Louis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jean Louis. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Friday, March 25, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Monday, March 21, 2011
Lolly Gagging

"I have known Joan Crawford for more than thirty-five years. I still don't know her at all..She is the only star I know who manufactured herself...She drew up a blueprint for herself and outlined a beautiful package of skin, bones and character and then set about to put life into the outline. She succeeded, and so Joan Crawford came into existence at the same time an overweight Charleston dancer, born Lucille LeSueur, disappeared from the world. It took me a long time to realize this. I believed, for some time, that Lucille existed under the skin." - Louella Parsons
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Friday, November 12, 2010
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Monday, November 8, 2010
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Stripping Away the Mystery

At the time of Marilyn Monroe's death, she was not, contrary to popular belief, unemployed and unemployable. Although she had been terminated from the unfinished Something's Got to Give (1962) due to excessive absenteeism, she had been quietly reinstated at 20th Century Fox, and scheduled to finish the picture. Of course, Monroe's death at age 36 on August 5, 1962 rendered that impossible; the film was completely recast and revamped as Move Over Darling (1963), starring Doris Day and James Garner.



With Monroe's death, the film went forward with a new, misleading title, The Stripper (1963) -- with the odd choice of Joanne Woodward in the lead. Perhaps in deference to the Oscar-winning Woodward's reputation as a heavy-hitting dramatic actress, Travilla ditched the more glamorous concepts he had envisioned for Monroe, and did tawdrier, cheaper-looking costumes for Woodward, admittedly more in keeping with the character's background as a small town Kansas girl with shattered Hollywood ambitions.

The film wasn't a success, although many did praise Woodward's fine acting; of all the proposed projects that Monroe didn't live to see come to fruition, this may be the most tantalizing. She certainly would have known how to get inside this particular character, perhaps even more so than the talented Miss Woodward. Of course, Fox being Fox, the publicity campaign verged on the exploitative, promising a leering, lecherous look at a burlesque queen, when in fact the film was more of a character study. Playing up the "stripper" angle, Gypsy Rose Lee was cast in a small, perfectly superfluous role. Adding to the tackiness, the beginning of the film includes a scene (which presumably would not have made it into the Monroe version) in which Lila is mistaken by Hollywood tourists for Jayne Mansfield and Kim Novak -- Mansfield being Fox's second-string blonde, used as a bargaining chip to keep Monroe in line, and Novak being the first actress asked to replace Monroe in Something's Got to Give.


When we originally posted the Travilla sketches, jiva was the first, and only, to correctly guess the film and the actress -- but later recanted! Darling Angela, never doubt your instincts; after all, it takes a beautiful, leggy blonde to know one!
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Very Vera
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Monday, March 15, 2010
And Now, a Word From Our Sponsor

Darlings, SSUWAT is going on a little hiatus. Not forever, mind you, and hopefully, not for long. Since it is permanently 1962-ish around here, and we weren't even born then, we shan't bore you with the messy, real life details. In all seriousness, one of the things we have made a concentrated effort to avoid being is a confessional, bleeding heart kind of blog. We are only interested in the pretty, fabulous, glamorous side of life here at SSUWAT, darn it, and that's the way it's going to stay! We do, however, need some time off to take care of things that, well, need taking care of. Have we thanked you lately for your almost two years of support?! Thank you, thank you, thank you. We'll be seeing you soon.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









































